The language and understanding are different. Freedom to Muslims means freedom from manmade laws, such as the Magna Carta and English Common Law, and of course our Constitution. Only Allah is allowed to make laws, so we’re suffering under oppression and tumult (and we must be freed of that) because in our hearts we’re yearning to get close to the real god, Allah (and that’s because we’re all born Muslims, cuz Allah is the founder of the world).

Justice can only come from Allah, too, because his words are what make up the Sharia, which is partially based on the Qur’an, the pure, wholly uncreated word of Allah, with no man’s interference, and only Allah’s law is completely “just.”

This is the basis of their end goal (as regards to us) : Establish a North American
caliphate by jihad (overt or covert) in place of the USA and rule it with Sharia law.

As to their right to jihad, that’s because THEY are suffering under oppression (derived from a concept called Fitna). We Westerners are keeping them from fulfilling Allah’s decree that all the world submit to Allah so that at last there will be peace (no oppression or tumult), because they’ve fought jihad to remove the obstacles to that. This makes jihad a double-edged sword, both offensive and defensive. No winners but them in that game.

Once you crack you head on their meanings of words, Choudary doesn’t sound so extreme. He isn’t, in fact; he’s simply an orthodox follower. He’s just doin’ what the good Muhammad told him thru Allah and then everything was set in stone when the scholars compiled Sharia law.

Choudary was shining us on about a lot of practices, though, like the No Stoning stuff. It says in Sharia Law: “If the offender (adulterer) is someone with the capacity to remain chaste (anyone who’s married and cheats), then he or she is stoned to death.” As to wearing the burqa, that bit comes from the idea of not being seen “naked” in public: “. . . In the prayer room, it means everything besides the face and hands. And when . . . in the street, it refers to the entire body.” And there’s the ugly rule of honor killing: “No one may seek retaliation for a parent killing his child or spouse . . .” Almost without fail the child or spouse is a woman. They are embarrassing Islam and insulting Allah by their rebelliousness, so they deserve to die.

Lastly, Choudary’s argument that we all deserve to die because we’re “carpet bombing” and fighting on Muslim land is just plain old double-talk. Once an area is conquered by Islam, it is considered forever part of Islam, so in that sense, Spain is still theirs. It is the basis of their claim on Jerusalem; they conquered it in 634, so it’s still theirs. The Sharia (compiled around 750) says jihad “means to war against non-Muslims.” There’s no ambiguity there. The Sharia has informed their colonialism, conquests, imperialism, and genocide for close to 1400 years; fighting back against being attacked has nothing to do with their attacking us in the first place; attacking is what they do.

It’s all about them and their Sharia law. It isn’t gong to change by dressing it up with common terms like “democratic state” or “social justice.”

Sharia is totalitarian and supremacist. It’s them or the highway. Once Egyptians “democratically” vote in the MB (and I believe they will), we’re in trouble, same as Israel. With such total control of the region, the Islamists can control the flow oil and we all know what that means to us.

H/T Dorrie