When a news report as hideous as this one comes along, no one is really surprised to discover the culturally enriched aspects of the crime. Even if they are not allowed to discuss it, most citizens of major Western European cities surely expect that grotesquely violent crime and debased behavior are overwhelmingly the province of Third World immigrants, and especially adherents of the Religion of Peace.
Nor does it come as a surprise, when the names of the perpetrators are finally revealed in court, to find out that the crime has a high Mohammed Coefficient — in this case, 100%.
In places such as Sweden, publication of the names of defendants is not permitted, even after they are convicted, so that the ethnicity or religious affiliation of the perps has to be deduced from incidental information. In other countries the surnames are omitted, so newspaper readers are subjected to absurd accounts of, say, a gang rape committed by “Mohammed S., Muhammad R., Mohamed A., and Abdul H.” (MC: 75%)
There is scant public discussion of why these atrocities so often result in a gaggle of Mohammeds queued up for their stretch in a state penal facility. In those rare cases when reasons are adduced, they are generally economic and “cultural” — poverty brought about by lack of education — or, preferably, the fault of the natives, whose “racist” attitudes and behaviors are to blame for the misguided behavior of the criminals.
Take a look at this report from The Daily Mail, if you have a strong stomach:
a12iggymom's Blog 