Glenn Beck and Co, get it all wrong…AGAIN! Cruz NOT a Natural Born Citizen!


Using the same laws as the Founders, Frances Vattel’s Law of Nations and NOT the English Blackstone (remember we had just FOUGHT the the British for FREEDOM), neither Obama nor Cruz, jindal oe Rubio are eligable to be President or Vice-President. Cruzs` father was NOT a citizen when he was born. Natural Born Citizen definition by Vattel is TWO citizen Parents…Please do as you say you do and FOLLOW THE FOUNDERS! 2 Citizen Parents! Vettal’s Law of Nations, Section 211 & 212. LOOK IT UP! YOU TOO GLENN.

See the idiocy here: http://www.glennbeck.com/2013/08/19/not-again-a-new-birther-movement-is-going-after-ted-cruz/

Please read and leave a comment!

some from there:

Beck believes in every part of the Constitution except when it comes to the eligibility requirements of the presidency.

That part he disregards.

Hey, could Cruz be President of the US and PM of Canada simultaneously? It is then just a few obummanista steps to reunification of North America and with a few more obummanista tweeks Central America and South America could be brought into the fold. Tomorrow the world.

” Many conservatives were convinced that Obama was born outside the US”
I think you are watching way to much MSNBC.. It was the Democrats who claimed that Obama was not born in the US.. Phillip Berg was a Hilary Clinton supporter, when she and BHO were running for the democrats Nomination, and he was the one who started this absurd idea….. MSNBC has done its best to never tell it’s viewers, the little they have left, that simple fact, that The Democrats are the Birthers.

Unknown's avatar

About a12iggymom

Conservative - Christian - Patriot
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

6 Responses to Glenn Beck and Co, get it all wrong…AGAIN! Cruz NOT a Natural Born Citizen!

  1. upaces1945@gmail.com's avatar upaces88 says:

    THANK YOU!

    Like

    • a12iggymom's avatar a12iggymom says:

      Part of Madisons notes:
      Chap. Ⅲ.—An Act to establish an uniform Rule of Naturalization.[1]March 26, 1790.

      Section 1.Repealed by act of January 29, 1795, ch. 20. Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, That any alien, being a free white person, Alien whites may become citizens, and how. who shall have resided within the limits and under the jurisdiction of the United States for the term of two years, may be admitted to become a citizen thereof, on application to any common law court of record, in any one of the states wherein he shall have resided for the term of one year at least, and making proof to the satisfaction of such court, that he is a person of good character, and taking the oath or affirmation prescribed by law, to support the constitution of the United States, which oath or affirmation such court shall administer; and the clerk of such court shall record such application, and the proceedings thereon; and thereupon such person shall be considered as a citizen of the United States. And the children of such persons so naturalized, dwelling within the United States, being under the age of twenty-one years at the time of such naturalization,Their children residing here, deemed citizens. shall also be considered as citizens of the United States. And the children of citizens of the United States, that may be born beyond sea, Also, children of citizens born beyond sea, &c. or out of the limits of the United States, shall be considered as natural born citizens: Provided, That the right of citizenship shall not descend to persons whose fathers have never been resident in the United States: Exceptions. Provided also, That no person heretofore proscribed by any state, shall be admitted a citizen as aforesaid, except by an act of the legislature of the state in which such person was proscribed.[2] http://en.wikisource.org/wiki/United_States_Statutes_at_Large/Volume_1/1st_Congress/2nd_Session/Chapter_3

      Full text of the Naturalization Act: http://www.earlyamerica.com/earlyamerica/milestones/naturalization/naturalization_text.html

      Approved, March 26, 1790.

      Like

  2. upaces1945@gmail.com's avatar upaces88 says:

    It is really very simple. The reason the Founding Fathers made that a strong point…they didn’t want to ALLOW ANY BRITISH to infiltrate the New Government.

    Like

    • a12iggymom's avatar a12iggymom says:

      Yes, but I have had Blackstone thrown all over the place over Obama.

      Like

      • upaces1945@gmail.com's avatar upaces88 says:

        Would you mind explaining more of what you mean….maybe(?) I am just too tired. I’m not understanding you.

        Like

      • a12iggymom's avatar a12iggymom says:

        Vattel’s Laws of Nations, what the Founders used to write the Constitution, not the British Laws written by Blackstone. http://constitution.org/vattel/vattel_01.htm

        CHAP. XIX.
        OF OUR NATIVE COUNTRY, AND SEVERAL THINGS THAT RELATE TO IT.
        § 211. What is our country.

        THE whole of the countries possessed by a nation and subject to its laws, forms, as we have already said, its territory, and is the common country of all the individuals of the nation. We have been obliged to anticipate the definition of the term, native country (§ 122), because our subject led us to treat of the love of our country — a virtue so excellent and so necessary in a state. Supposing, then, this definition already known, it remains that we should explain several things that have a relation to this subject, and answer the questions that naturally arise from it.
        § 212. Citizens and natives.

        The citizens are the members of the civil society; bound to this society by certain duties, and subject to its authority, they equally participate in its advantages. The natives, or natural-born citizens, are those born in the country, of parents who are citizens. As the society cannot exist and perpetuate itself otherwise than by the children of the citizens, those children naturally follow the condition of their fathers, and succeed to all their rights. The society is supposed to desire this, in consequence of what it owes to its own preservation; and it is presumed, as matter of course, that each citizen, on entering into society, reserves to his children the right of becoming members of it. The country of the fathers is therefore that of the children; and these become true citizens merely by their tacit consent. We shall soon see whether, on their coming to the years of discretion, they may renounce their right, and what they owe to the society in which they were born. I say, that, in order to be of the country, it is necessary that a person be born of a father who is a citizen; for, if he is born there of a foreigner, it will be only the place of his birth, and not his country.

        Like

Comments are closed.