The Framers DID consider born to 2 citizens to be natural born—Here is the proof!->Naturalization Act of March 26, 1790 (1 Stat 103-104) (Excerpts) And the children of such persons so naturalized, dwelling within the United States, being under the age of twenty-one years at the time of such naturalization, shall also be considered as citizens of the United States. And the children of citizens of the United States, that may be born beyond sea, or out of the limits of the United States, shall be considered as natural born citizens:

NOTE–This act was repealed in 1795. The purpose of showing this excerpt is to lend credence to the claims that being born to 2 citizens was considered by the Framers to be natural born in the tradition of Vattels Law of Nations. G Washington signed this act into law in the 1st yr of the 1st congress.

I would contend that the repeal of this act did not mean the definition of natural born was rejected. Realize the constitution was adopted in 1787—ratified in 88—-G Washington assumed office in 89—and the naturalization act was signed into law in 90. Above all else we have proof right here that the congress defined natural born as born to 2 citizens so all myths claiming the term was never defined are proven wrong by this repealed act. It is also unrealistic to assume that natural born means something different than born to 2 citizens when born here with the sole exception being native born may have been an additional requirement. That said, we have enough here to reasonably claim that Obama is not natural born!

Join us at TPO to put in your 2 cents worth!

Visit Tea Party Organizers — A Troll-Free No Spin Zone! at: http://teapartyorganizers.ning.com/?xg_source=msg_mes_network